NFL players are using social media to push for natural grass fields across the league, pointing to the temporary grass surfaces installed for World Cup matches held in NFL stadiums this summer. Players attached the hashtag "WorthTheCost" to posts questioning why those surfaces were available for the tournament but not for their own games.
Chicago Bears quarterback Caleb Williams, Washington Commanders tackle Laremy Tunsil, Indianapolis Colts running back Jonathan Taylor, Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker Patrick Queen and New York Jets defensive lineman Harrison Phillips were among those who posted the hashtag Friday.
"If stadiums can make grass work for the World Cup, they can make it work for NFL players," multiple players wrote on X. "We're #WorthTheCost."
The NFL Players Association pointed to a statement it issued in mid-June as the World Cup began, criticizing the league's approach to field surfaces.
"The temporary installation of natural grass fields for the World Cup is a choice by certain NFL team owners to do for soccer players what they refuse to do for NFL players," the NFLPA said. "It's no longer a question of capability: the technology exists, the expertise exists and the resources exist to install the high-level grass fields that our players overwhelmingly prefer. We have seen the meaningful investments made to meet the standard for international athletes and global events. NFL players, who regularly compete on these fields, help fund these stadiums, and whose work makes the league what it is today, deserve the same commitment to quality grass fields."
The union's statement cited a player poll showing 92 percent of more than 1,700 respondents preferred natural grass, while just 2 percent favored synthetic turf. NFLPA executive director JC Tretter elaborated on the players' preference earlier this offseason.
"You want high-quality surfaces," said Tretter. "I think one thing is understanding what our players care about, and there is something there that the data hasn't been able to spit back out at us. There is something about the feeling of being on grass, your body feels different. I think if you ask the coaches, just standing on grass versus standing on turf feels different. There is something there that impacts the body."
As stadiums began removing their temporary World Cup grass surfaces, the NFLPA encouraged players to speak out publicly. Steelers cornerback Doneiko Slaughter and Cardinals cornerback Garrett Williams were among those who echoed the campaign.
"We've seen what's possible," they posted. "Now it's time to make grass fields the standard. Players are #WorthTheCost."
The NFL remains evenly split between surface types, with 15 venues using natural grass and 15 using synthetic turf. Green Bay Packers tight end Tucker Kraft, whose team already plays on grass, voiced support for expanding the standard leaguewide.
"Green Bay Packers are spoiled since we play on the greatest surface in the NFL," said Kraft. "Natural grass is the best, and should be the only surface we play on. We are #WorthTheCost."
A 2023 poll conducted by The Athletic found that 82.7 percent of players considered turf-related injury risk a real concern. Ownership groups have shown mixed willingness to address the issue. Dallas Cowboys executive vice president Stephen Jones expressed skepticism in 2023 about installing grass at AT&T Stadium, while Las Vegas Raiders owner Mark Davis said this month he has always believed football should be played on grass, citing safety and aesthetics.
San Francisco 49ers tight end George Kittle also addressed the issue in a June statement, arguing the World Cup preparations proved the change is feasible.
"We've made it clear that we prefer grass fields," said Kittle. "We know it's better on our bodies. And clearly, we know it's possible based on everything that went into putting down grass fields for the World Cup in each stadium. At this point, it comes down to the NFL making it a priority and choosing to invest in us as players, because our bodies are our business, which they get to capitalize on!"